Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

You Changed Your Mind, The Model Didn't: Demystifying Intent in Multi-Turn Dialogue

When a large language model handles a multi-turn task and a user proposes a change but ultimately rejects it, the model should continue as if nothing changed. We find a surprising failure: merely mentioning a rejected change can derail task execution, even when the user's final intent remains unchanged. To systematically study language model behavior under evolving user intent, we introduce Intent-Eval, a controlled benchmark spanning tool actions, code, databases, and mathematics. Across diverse tasks, models are vulnerable to both rejected proposals and superseded requirements, consistent with mentioned-as-in-effect confusion: conversational content is treated as active requirements eve...

AuthorsJunle Chen, Wei Chen, Zhengjun Huang et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published5 October 2026
Last updated at source5 October 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/eee5d72e-bfd2-4d0f-9f68-575a4ee5dc13" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.