Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Multimodal Safety Evaluation Should Measure Controllability Beyond Classification

VLM safety is commonly evaluated through input- and output-level classification. Such classification is necessary, but it does not reveal whether a safety state is accessible or controllable inside the model. We argue that multimodal safety evaluation should therefore report a \emph{controllability profile} alongside behavioral classification, separating representation-level detectability, cross-modal specificity, intervention sensitivity, and benign-preserving selectivity. Using implicit toxicity as a stress case, we instantiate this profile on LlavaGuard and Qwen3.5 with sparse feature decompositions. LlavaGuard admits localized handles with a narrow benign-preserving intervention range...

AuthorsJunhyeong Park, Hanwool Lee, DongGeon Lee et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published5 October 2026
Last updated at source5 October 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a19b52d0-4edb-4543-af22-47ff1a88ae6f" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.