Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Do Time-Series QA Systems Read the Time Series? Evidence Use and Reasoning Reliability

In recent years, time-series question answering (QA) systems have made significant progress. However, generating a correct answer does not show whether retaining the supplied numerical series improves task performance, nor whether the prediction is sensitive to changes in that input. While some systems provide rationales, answer accuracy also does not show whether their numerical claims are grounded in the supplied series or whether the stated inference is valid. In this work, we focus on evaluating four time-series QA systems: TimeOmni-1, ChatTS, TimeOmni-VL, and Time-MQA. First, for three systems with released evaluation data, we reproduce their reported results and compare the performa...

AuthorsZhuomin Chen, Jingchao Ni, Xu Zheng et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published5 October 2026
Last updated at source5 October 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/9bca36b8-544c-42b3-ab3f-1a36ce05c590" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.