Knowing the Rules, Applying the Rules: Evaluating Language Models on Traditional Chinese Bazi
Knowing domain rules does not guarantee applying them to a case. We study this distinction in traditional Chinese Bazi through 3,000 Chinese multiple-choice questions spanning 14 Theory and 11 Case categories. Six endpoint systems are evaluated, with primary results reported on a 2,492-item model-informed refinement. Theory accuracy exceeds Case accuracy for every system, and gaps of 16.60-29.56 percentage points remain when invalid responses are excluded. The contrast is more specific than a general case-reasoning deficit. Across six systems, Twelve Stages and Nayin reach mean accuracies of 89.10% and 88.62%, while Shensha Basics reaches 75.96%. Within Case, Luck Pillars averages 84.62%,...
| Authors | Jiulin Li, Ping Huang |
|---|---|
| Primary category | cs.CL |
| Published | 5 October 2026 |
| Last updated at source | 5 October 2026 |
Popularity, last 2 days
0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.
Connected in the knowledge graph
- MonsterPPPPP/BaZi2500Dataset · cited by
Models and datasets referencing this paper
- MonsterPPPPP/BaZi2500Dataset
Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.