Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

An evolutionary origin of collective decision making in humans and machines

Groups of individuals can solve collective problems more accurately than any single member, by aggregating their opinions. Recent theoretical work has identified individual-level reward schemes that allow uninformed individuals to evolve collective intelligence from the bottom up, through social learning. Yet these results are restricted to linear prediction problems and simple averaging, while the decision tasks that real groups confront are often non-linear, and the institutions that aggregate opinions are seldom single-layer averages: districts elect representatives who in turn vote on policy, referees advise editors who decide on publication. Here we develop a framework for the evolut...

AuthorsGuocheng Wang, Qi Su, Joshua B. Plotkin
Primary categoryphysics.soc-ph
Published5 October 2026
Last updated at source5 October 2026
physics.soc-phcs.LGq-bio.PE
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e10aaa11-d7d3-46ad-867e-e77dd301bb39" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.