Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

When Does Longer Reasoning Help? Predicting Mathematical Reasoning Through Discovery and Execution

Test-time compute can improve mathematical reasoning, but can short-budget runs predict how mathematical reasoning scales with additional compute? We introduce a Discovery--Execution (DE) framework that predicts the aggregate held-out scaling curves through a convolution of strategy discovery and conditional execution. From independent short-budget attempts and oracle-sketch-conditioned runs, the framework estimates cumulative success along held-out reasoning trajectories under alternate compute allocations. We evaluate four models on 35 fresh Olympiad problems and non-geometry problems from IMO-ProofBench Advanced. Under the DE framework, near-saturated execution predicts geometric scali...

AuthorsAdib Hasan, Lay Jain, Thanic Nur Samin
Primary categorycs.LG
Published4 October 2026
Last updated at source4 October 2026
cs.LGcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b5b50f39-11cf-43e7-be27-8c731a800c1d" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Connected in the knowledge graph

Explore this entry in the graph

Models and datasets referencing this paper

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 16 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.