Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Measuring Learned Monotone Temporal Aggregation at Matched Admissibility

Risk regulation imposes directional constraints on scores; we adopt their strict per-input form -- the score monotone non-decreasing in every exposure input -- as a normative commitment. Deployed pipelines -- monotone hand-crafted aggregates feeding sign-constrained gradient boosting -- already satisfy it by composition, so constrained-versus-unconstrained comparisons price a guarantee the incumbent has for free. We instead hold admissibility fixed on both sides and measure what learning the aggregation is worth. Our instrument is a recurrent network whose state is classical risk statistics (an exponentially weighted moving average and a high-water mark with learned transforms), monotone ...

AuthorsYew Lee Tan
Primary categorycs.LG
Published4 October 2026
Last updated at source8 October 2026
cs.LGq-fin.RMstat.ML
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/9e347a24-1960-43cd-867c-41a7618d4a79" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.