Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Component-Level Evaluation of Adaptive PINN Training for CFD-Oriented Crystal Growth Simulation

Physics-informed neural network (PINN) training minimizes a weighted combination of partial differential equation (PDE), boundary-condition, and initial-condition losses. Because adaptive methods modify these weights during training, their weighted total losses are not always directly comparable. We compare fixed-weight PINN, gradient-normalized PINN (GNPINN), and a rule-based adaptive controller (AgenticPINN) under matched settings on a heat-equation benchmark and a simplified Czochralski-oriented thermal-fluid problem. In the crystal-growth MLP experiment, adaptive control reduced the PDE residual from the order of $10^{-5}$ to $10^{-6}$, while the boundary-condition loss increased from...

AuthorsNiruta Chapagain, Rohit Raj, Bertwin Kurisinkal Shine et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published4 October 2026
Last updated at source4 October 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c7c5e236-7b0c-4470-99d2-729f40d23ed2" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.