Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Selecting Repetition Counts Across Model Scales in Data-Constrained Pretraining

The repetition count that works best for a small language model may not remain best at a larger scale. We study this effect in pretraining with a finite target corpus mixed with generic data at a fixed target fraction. On Wikipedia-derived data and Proof-Pile-2, the ranking of measured repetition counts changes with model size, and a 520M Proof-Pile-2 experiment confirms that reducing repetition from sixteen to eight improves loss while using fewer training tokens. We use loss curves from several smaller models to retain a short list of promising repetition counts for evaluation at a larger scale. On PubMed and Caselaw, candidate sets fixed before target-model training retain the lowest-l...

AuthorsZiyue WANG, T. Kanamori
Primary categorycs.CL
Published4 October 2026
Last updated at source4 October 2026
cs.CLstat.ML
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/80ca5700-141d-4ee9-b0d8-b90f3ebe60bc" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.