Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Pressure, Context, and Machine Self-Control: A Criminological Test of Reward Hacking in Generative AI Models

Recent incidents show that AI agents sometimes reach measured goals through unsanctioned means. This study applies self-control, general strain, anomie, neutralization and routine activity theory to reward hacking in generative AI models, and it treats the measures as behavioral analogues. Study 1 (2,310 conversations, seven models) measured delay discounting with the Kirby Monetary Choice Questionnaire and stated willingness to take shortcuts. Pressure raised the discount rate k 2.8-fold in fresh conversations but 12.6-fold when the same sentence followed a baseline answer, which indicates a response to conversational cues rather than a stable trait. Models chose a shortcut in 1 of 700 d...

AuthorsMurat Ozer, Isaac Kofi Nti
Primary categorycs.AI
Published3 October 2026
Last updated at source3 October 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ef9f34bb-71ea-4d92-be20-163916543d33" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.