Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

PyINE: A Framework for Scalable Elicitation and Oversight via Code Execution

Reasoning models can remain capable of solving a task while still defaulting to cheaper but misleading shortcuts. This creates a central oversight problem: when a model gives an answer with plausible but incomplete reasoning, can an overseer determine whether that output should be trusted? To study this problem, we introduce PyINE, a framework for scalable elicitation and oversight using instrumented Python programs as a verifiable execution substrate. In PyINE, programs define task environments, execution traces provide authoritative labels for outcomes and intermediate facts, and task variants can be generated mechanically rather than through static human annotation. We instantiate the ...

AuthorsPierre-Luc St-Charles, Alessandro Palmas, Damiano Fornasiere et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published3 October 2026
Last updated at source10 October 2026
cs.AIcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/77685909-eee1-4fb4-b644-4e8b507d35e2" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.