Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Stance Drift: How AI-mediated Communication Distorts Our Message

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly mediate human communication, from drafting emails to summarizing scientific reports, yet whether they faithfully preserve a speaker's position remains largely untested. We model AI-mediated communication as a two-step generation-extraction pipeline: one LLM produces an argument from a specified stance, and a second LLM extracts the stance from that argument. We represent the pipeline as a probabilistic state transition over five Likert-type stance categories and define the stance preservation rate (SPR) as the average probability that the extracted stance matches the initial stance. Across 112 debate propositions, none of the nine LLMs tested exce...

AuthorsLingchong Liu, Yanfei Zhou, Jacob Bien et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published3 October 2026
Last updated at source3 October 2026
cs.CLstat.AP
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ef0b78b0-9e96-4fc0-a7ee-1d2b49aebbce" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.