Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

StegoMemory: Agentic Memory Acts as Covert Steganographic Channel

Is agentic memory robust against stealthy steganographic attacks? We carry out a large-scale red-teaming exercise to test whether agents can encode attacker-controlled strings in one session and recover them in another without triggering safety oversight. Following SHADE-Arena-style tasks, we embed malicious side tasks to encode secret strings using steganography within otherwise benign tasks and evaluate them using independent task-completion and safety oversight. We test 14,000 attack trials spanning 91 model-attack configurations, 13 models, and 7 steganographic schemes: Acrostic, Mesostic, Telestich, Word-choice, Capitalization, Position-based, and Homoglyph. 41.2% of trials successfu...

AuthorsSnehasis Mukhopadhyay, Arun Nair
Primary categorycs.CR
Published3 October 2026
Last updated at source3 October 2026
cs.CRcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d421619b-91d4-4580-8a3a-318b190e4124" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.