Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Evidence and Intervention: A Coupled Active-Inference Extension of Rational Speech Act Models

Identical utterance choices can arise from different communicative causes, and identical interpretations can leave different traces in what a listener learns. Rational Speech Act (RSA) models treat interpretation as inference over speaker meaning, but standard one-shot RSA does not intrinsically distinguish these causal update targets. We develop a coupled active-inference model of dialogue in which a listener's likelihood for an utterance is the policy distribution attributed to the speaker, placing the speaker's expected free energy within the listener's variational free energy. Each utterance is therefore both evidence about and an intervention on a partner. The model separates four up...

AuthorsYonghyeon Gwon, Elliot Murphy, Chun Kee Chung
Primary categorycs.CL
Published3 October 2026
Last updated at source3 October 2026
cs.CLcs.MA
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/70e33bd4-2c86-452c-b9df-410f912a6aeb" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.