Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

On the Steering Dimensionality of Refusal in Language Models

Existing activation steering methods often assume that a high-level concept can be mediated by a single steering direction. To support this, two complementary interventions should be achieved: additive steering should induce the target behavior, while directional ablation should suppress it. Yet behaviors may occupy richer activation geometries beyond a single direction, and semantically similar behaviors may be represented by distinct directions. In this work, we study how many directions can reliably control two different types of refusal behaviors: refusal triggered by the safety alignment and refusal in general contexts. Given the limited expressive capability of a single steering vec...

AuthorsHan Wang, Erik Miehling, Dennis Wei et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published3 October 2026
Last updated at source3 October 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ad6c8cf7-bd71-4cfb-8188-5f07fefb3ed7" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.