Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

LongSocialBench: Do Long-Context LLMs Understand Online Discussion Threads?

Long-context LLMs can now ingest entire online discussion threads, but understanding their social discourse requires more than reading a long document: models must track parent-reply relations, turning points, scoped subtrees, cross-branch contrasts, and participant trajectories. To test this structure-aware social reasoning, we introduce LongSocialBench, a benchmark of 1,462 verified human-authored multiple-choice items drawn from 94 complete Hacker News, Stack Exchange, and Reddit r/ChangeMyView episodes, with a median length of approximately 73K tokens. Each item pairs a complete serialized discussion and reply structure with a four-option question, requiring models to recover structur...

AuthorsXinyi Liu, Rinat Khaziev, Dilek Hakkani-Tür et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published2 October 2026
Last updated at source2 October 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d64d3c8f-4463-4dd0-b2c5-9b961e7a627a" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.