Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Iterating Consistency Models: Stability, Error Bounds and Noise Schedules

Consistency models (CMs) have become a leading approach for generating high-quality samples in few steps. However, adding steps can improve or degrade sample quality in ways that are highly sensitive to the schedule and that existing theory does not fully explain. To provide accuracy guarantees and guide CM sampler design, we analyze multistep CM sampling as a composition of noising and approximate denoising operators. Under explicit, verifiable stability assumptions, we derive a non-asymptotic error bound that separates contraction of the initialization error from accumulation of approximation error. The bound assigns distinct roles to the schedule: large early noise levels drive contrac...

AuthorsAlessio Spagnoletti, Abdul-Lateef Haji-Ali, Andrés Almansa et al.
Primary categorystat.ML
Published2 October 2026
Last updated at source2 October 2026
stat.MLcs.CVcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/cc43ed32-8600-454a-bb93-9a0c17c47c15" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.