Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Sentry: Learning to Recover from LLM Agent Failures at Test Time

LLM agents often fail mid-task due to invalid tool calls, repeated actions, or poorly grounded reasoning, and learning from these failures is a path to reliability. We find that how failure knowledge reaches the agent matters as much as what it contains. Failure lessons are conditional: kept in the agent's context, they misfire when their failure is absent, and removing them from an evolving playbook improves performance. Runtime interventions, in contrast, act only when a failure occurs but do not learn from their repairs. We argue that failure knowledge is conditional knowledge and should be conditionally exposed, and instantiate this principle in Sentry, a failure-management layer that...

AuthorsChangxiu Ji, Amy Lu, Qizheng Zhang et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published2 October 2026
Last updated at source2 October 2026
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c3893df4-85f4-42a1-b72c-e1889b3476c7" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.