Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Learning Style, Forgetting Semantics: A Case Study of SFT and RFT on Classification Tasks

Why does supervised fine-tuning (SFT) lead to more forgetting than reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT), even when all teacher demonstrations are semantically correct? We study this question on classification tasks where tokens within each semantic class express the same semantic answer in different styles. The tasks share an underlying semantic rule but differ in their prompt distributions and teachers' stylistic preferences. Using a tractable linear-softmax policy, we derive an exact decomposition of the updates into semantic and style components. We show that, at a common policy and prompt, SFT and RFT have parallel semantic updates but differ in their style dynamics. Starting from a policy...

AuthorsHaodong Liang, Yanhao Jin, Krishnakumar Balasubramanian et al.
Primary categorystat.ML
Published1 October 2026
Last updated at source1 October 2026
stat.MLcs.AIcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d7615218-7237-4e50-8626-6a17f70e2f86" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.