Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Prompted to Discriminate: Generalizing Malicious-Input Probes in the Wild

LLM agents increasingly rely on activation probes as runtime monitors for prompt injection, jailbreaks, and unsafe requests, reading the model's own hidden state to catch a harmful input before the agent acts on it. A cheap, increasingly common move, borrowed from LLM-as-judge prompting, is to append a short classification instruction after the user's turn and read the probe at that point, to sharpen it: the instruction asks the model to represent the incoming request as a class, concentrating the signal the probe must separate, at negligible serving cost. But does the wording of that suffix matter, and does its benefit hold in the wild, on attack types the probe never saw in training, th...

AuthorsElad David, Max Fomin
Primary categorycs.LG
Published1 October 2026
Last updated at source1 October 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f7fc7c72-5931-4815-a8df-a4dd19087820" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.