Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Artifact Annotations Partially Substitute for Per-User Calibration: SAFE-EDA and a Normalization-Controlled Evaluation of Wrist-EDA Affect Recognition

Wrist electrodermal activity (EDA) differs in amplitude from one person to the next, so affect-recognition models normalize their input before classification. Studies that test such models on held-out subjects seldom report where the normalization statistics come from, yet statistics computed from the held-out subject's own recording give the model information that a device does not have when it is first worn. We asked how this choice alters the measured benefit of pretraining. A compact convolutional network, SAFE-EDA, was pretrained on expert artifact annotations from 43 subjects and compared with the same network trained from scratch on the Wearable Stress and Affect Detection (WESAD) ...

AuthorsHaochen Chai, Xinbi Luo, Zining Liu et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published1 October 2026
Last updated at source1 October 2026
cs.LGeess.SP
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/fa6c4380-8665-4b08-82cc-1ebeecd3bfda" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.