Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

MIKASA-Robo-VLA: Benchmarking Memory in VLA Models for Long-Horizon Manipulation

Vision-language-action policies often see only one or a few recent frames, which makes it difficult to evaluate how they use information that disappears during a task. We introduce MIKASA-Robo-VLA, a benchmark of 90 language-conditioned manipulation tasks. All but 10 hide the cue an action depends on. Those 10 are reactive controls. MIKASA-Robo, the suite it rebuilds, has 32 tasks and uses language only in a representative VLA subset. Here every task provides an instruction, while memory-dependent tasks hide a task-relevant cue and reactive controls keep it available. For 70 tasks, environment phase timings specify an information gap, and for 28 of them the gap exceeds the 16-frame window...

AuthorsEgor Cherepanov, Nikita Kachaev, Aleksandr I. Panov et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published30 September 2026
Last updated at source30 September 2026
cs.LGcs.AIcs.RO
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e9ccc440-ab9e-4f0f-95eb-f05369bd9fb0" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Connected in the knowledge graph

Explore this entry in the graph

Models and datasets referencing this paper

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.