Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Do Better Scores Mean Better Physics? Physics-Grounded Explanations for Sim2Real Neural Operators

Machine-learning surrogates accelerate physical simulation, but lower prediction error need not coincide with lower error in physically relevant flow statistics. We examine this question for flow around a NACA4418 airfoil using paired computational-fluid-dynamics simulations and experimental particle-image-velocimetry measurements. A mean-preserving input intervention removes velocity fluctuations from selected regions of observed flow histories. Across four neural operators, removing fluctuations from the most energetic 10% of valid observed cells changes forecasts more than equal-area random removal. Because the masks are not matched for removed fluctuation energy, this contrast measure...

AuthorsSomyajit Chakraborty, Xizhong Chen
Primary categorycs.LG
Published30 September 2026
Last updated at source30 September 2026
cs.LGphysics.flu-dyn
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e282c169-2cde-400b-a1a2-f62383ee2d0b" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.