Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Large Language Bayes Is Not Reparameterisation-Invariant

Large Language Bayes (LLB) answers an informal modelling question by sampling candidate probabilistic programs from a language model, running approximate inference on each, and averaging them with weights proportional to an exponentiated evidence bound. We show that this weighting depends on how a model is written. The log marginal likelihood is invariant to reparameterisation; the evidence bound is not. On eight schools the centered and non-centered programs are the same measure to $5.7\times10^{-14}$, yet their weights differ by $6.1\times$; importance weighting reduces this only to $2.2\times$, and reproducing the inference LLB actually runs, a full-covariance Gaussian matched to the p...

AuthorsJian Xu
Primary categorycs.LG
Published24 September 2026
Last updated at source24 September 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/7f6e4fb8-9264-445a-a4cb-a84eaf76310e" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.