Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Linguistic Loopholes in LLM Unlearning: From a 174-Language Benchmark to Coverage-Aware Unlearning

Unlearning a fact in one language does not guarantee its removal in others as changing the query or even the requested answer language can reopen seemingly forgotten knowledge -- a cross-lingual loophole. The most straightforward solution to this challenge -- unlearning in all languages -- is neither scalable nor desirable as it amplifies damage to unrelated model capabilities. We introduce the task of language budgeted multilingual unlearning where the goal is to select a subset of languages that maximizes cross-lingual erasure. To study this task we introduce the Cross-Lingual Unlearning Tensor, an unlearning benchmark that spans 174 language--script pairs and 25 atomic paraphrase types...

AuthorsTyler Skow, Shravan Chaudhari, Rama Chellappa et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published30 September 2026
Last updated at source30 September 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b1972489-a6ae-43d2-9737-346cc9800827" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.