Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Principal Component Regression Dominates all Monotone Spectral Filters for Linear Regression

We compare the instance-wise, finite-sample risks of monotone spectral filters for linear regression, a broad class of estimators including principal component regression (PCR), gradient descent (GD), and ridge regression. We show that PCR dominates all monotone spectral filters: compared to any such filter, the risk of optimally tuned PCR is no bigger by a constant factor for all problems. Furthermore, the dominance is strong if the filter is separated from step functions (e.g., GD and ridge): there exist problem instances for which the risk of PCR is smaller by a polynomial factor in sample size dependence. Our comparison results show that PCR is optimal and thus admissible among monoto...

AuthorsJuno Kim, Hengyu Fu, Peter Bartlett et al.
Primary categorystat.ML
Published30 September 2026
Last updated at source30 September 2026
stat.MLcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/73c57b5a-c995-4c1b-96d7-c04edeb8a59a" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.