Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Can Agents Trust Their Skills? Uncovering Unsafe Chains of Trust in Skill-Based LLM Agents

LLM agents increasingly rely on installable skills, which are packages of instructions, code, and resources that equip them with task-specific capabilities and, once installed, can be automatically invoked across subsequent user tasks. This creates a chain of trust in which users delegate authority to agents, while agent frameworks admit skill-provided content into the agents' context with insufficient validation, allowing malicious skills to influence agent behavior under that delegated authority. Yet, little is known about whether this trust model adequately constrains untrusted skill content before it reaches security-sensitive operations, or how frequently such trust violations arise ...

AuthorsYan Wang, Zhihao Zhang, Ke Chen et al.
Primary categorycs.CR
Published30 September 2026
Last updated at source30 September 2026
cs.CRcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c4fc83a6-2e96-4635-a5c0-7002b05e98c0" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.