Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Where the Evidence Lives: Auditing AI Companions' Self-Descriptions

Companion agents describe themselves: they remember, they understand their users, the relationship has changed them. We argue that such accounts, and the experience ratings that seem to confirm them, are checkable by users only where the evidence is theirs: in the agent's behavior, or in themselves. Where the evidence lives in the machinery, fluent self-description and moderately positive ratings do not establish that the mechanisms behind them ran. We demonstrate an audit procedure that sets an agent's self-description against its users' judgements and its implementation records, reporting each claim as supported, contradicted, or unresolved, and apply it to Lita, a proactive companion w...

AuthorsSeiya Ikeda, Shin-nosuke Ishikawa
Primary categorycs.HC
Published30 September 2026
Last updated at source30 September 2026
cs.HCcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a22a53b0-1eb6-4dcc-b941-7e698389c0de" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.