Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Interpretable but Fragile? Robustness of Concept Bottlenecks under Geometric-Semantic Perturbations

Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) are designed to provide interpretable intermediate representations, yet how such bottlenecks affect robustness remains unclear, with existing studies reporting mixed and sometimes contradictory findings. We argue that these discrepancies arise from conflating different robustness notions and perturbation regimes, rather than from fundamental disagreements about CBMs themselves. To disentangle these factors, we introduce a generator-based evaluation framework that enables controlled comparisons between standard classifiers and CBMs under two distinct perturbation types: continuous geometric perturbations in latent space and discrete semantic interventions i...

AuthorsHanwei Zhang, Tianma Hu, Gaojie Jin et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published29 September 2026
Last updated at source14 October 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/8139f686-f0cb-4d88-aa13-a6f793d92b87" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.