Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Policy-Conditioned AI-Use Detection: An Evidentiary Framework for Academic Publishing

Major venues now publish detailed rules about how authors, reviewers, and area chairs may use AI, and those rules differ by role, by task, and by what must be disclosed. AI detection, the instrument usually proposed to enforce them, estimates something else: whether an AI model wrote the text. We argue that this target is misaligned with the decisions conferences and journals face, and propose policy-conditioned AI-use detection, an evidentiary framework for assessing whether a human--AI workflow complied with a stated rule. Policy makes the governing rule an explicit input. Inference reports hypotheses, evidence, calibration regime, and uncertainty in place of verdicts such as "AI detect...

AuthorsJairo Diaz-Rodriguez, Mumin Jia
Primary categorycs.CL
Published29 September 2026
Last updated at source13 October 2026
cs.CLcs.AIcs.CY
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/6ff0d377-5d3f-461d-bab2-d73fd97045b2" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.