Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

What Was Said, Not What Was 'Thought': Type-6 Logic for CoT Verification

We introduce Type-6 logic, a variant of dynamic epistemic logic augmented with two operators (uncertainty and recurrence), designed to model the inferential dynamics of contemporary large language model (LLM) chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning. Type-6 accounts for common LLM reasoning pathologies such as unlicensed revision, enthymemes, loopbacks, and unverifiable/incorrect claims. We propose a verifier based on Type-6 logic that builds a graph out the trace, and checks it against Type-6's axioms and inference rules. We evaluate our framework on LLM-generated CoTs four splits spanning formal and informal reasoning. Our verifier detects structurally unsound reasoning steps that surface-level...

AuthorsAdrian de Wynter
Primary categorycs.LO
Published29 September 2026
Last updated at source29 September 2026
cs.LOcs.AIcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a8e6ee4e-ea4f-4513-afde-c8d5eb6c63c0" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.