Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Evaluating Whether LLMs Can Reliably Connect the DOTs?

Access to real-world information is often noisy and fragmented. Constructing a coherent narrative from such fragments requires models to reconstruct missing spans within a broader storyline, commonly referred to as text infilling, while preserving consistency with both the local context and the global storyline. Despite using text infilling as a pre-training objective in many Large Language Models (LLMs), their actual performance on real-world narrative infilling remains underexplored. In this paper, we address this gap by introducing a multi-domain benchmark of ~9.2K instances for narrative infilling, constructed by masking one to three sentences across four narrative types: encyclopedic...

AuthorsEftekhar Hossain, John Salvador, Santu Karmaker
Primary categorycs.CL
Published29 September 2026
Last updated at source29 September 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/fa4ea2d2-d221-4521-b7de-6d9f9739d2c0" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.