Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Which Models Work Well Together? Measuring Heterogeneity for LLM Team Selection

The performance ceiling of an LLM team is constrained not only by individual model capabilities, but also by inter-member error resonance and predictive differences. Although heterogeneous teaming is often observed to be effective in practice, existing approaches lack complementarity metrics that are computable, interpretable, and optimizable, leaving team composition to rely on heuristics. We propose a heterogeneity-driven team selection framework that performs offline profiling to characterize individual capability along with two complementary signals: one captures decorrelation in error patterns to reduce co-failures, while the other measures divergence in predictive behavior to captur...

AuthorsLiangyu Teng, Hengsong Liu, Juncen Guo et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published29 September 2026
Last updated at source29 September 2026
cs.CLcs.LGcs.MA
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e5459cf5-e858-4e0b-a7de-baa08dec7ad7" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.