Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Correct, Don't Delete: Mitigating Emergent Misalignment with Corrective Supervision

Fine-tuning a language model on a narrow set of harmful demonstrations, such as bad medical advice, can make it broadly misaligned on unrelated questions, a phenomenon known as emergent misalignment (EM). The usual defense is to find the offending rows and delete them, but a row locator failed our held-out test and deleting rows helps less than expected. We ask a different question: given a fixed set of poisoned rows, is it better to correct them than to remove them? We fine-tune Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct on a mixture of bad medical advice and benign chat data, select a quarter of the poison rows in advance, and either delete them or replace each with a corrected answer to the same prompt, kee...

AuthorsJacob Epifano
Primary categorycs.CL
Published29 September 2026
Last updated at source29 September 2026
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/86527ec4-4bd9-47fa-b25d-df4e55ba429b" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.