Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

REALHOP: Rethinking Multi-Hop Reasoning Evaluation via Behavioral Auditing

Complex questions often require multi-hop reasoning that connects facts distributed across sources or distant regions of a long context through intermediate steps. Benchmarks commonly evaluate this ability with questions built around predefined reasoning chains, treating a correct answer as evidence that the intended composition was used. Yet answer correctness alone leaves open whether success depends on the evidence associated with each intended step: models may instead rely on memorized associations, shorter paths, or partial evidence. We examine this dependence using the Behavioral Necessity Rate (BNR), which measures how often targeted evidence removal prevents answer recovery on ini...

AuthorsJiawen Tao, Xiaokun Yuan, Yaoming Li et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published29 September 2026
Last updated at source29 September 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/bc995665-bd04-4929-858c-c1a2ee479ae7" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.