Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Equally Good, Yet Different: Benchmarking Rashomon sets in AutoML packages

The Rashomon effect describes the existence of multiple near-optimal models that achieve comparable performance while offering fundamentally different explanations. This creates a critical vulnerability in AutoML: x-hacking, the selective post-hoc choice of a model based on its explanation rather than predictive merit. No existing AutoML framework exposes this risk. We introduce ARSA ML, an open-source Python framework that quantifies Rashomon set structure and predictive multiplicity within AutoML pipelines. Using ARSA ML, we benchmark AutoGluon and H2O across 28 binary classification datasets, and conduct a post-hoc x-hacking analysis revealing a consistent structural asymmetry: AutoGlu...

AuthorsKatarzyna Woźnica, Katarzyna Rogalska, Zuzanna Sieńko et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published29 September 2026
Last updated at source29 September 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d06e2b9c-e6d8-4aaf-8d0d-023d1c3779d8" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.