Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Improving scalable oversight with co-trained monitors

Worker-monitor setups are a promising approach to AI oversight, but training workers against fixed monitors can incentivize monitor evasion. We study whether this failure mode can be avoided by co-training the monitor alongside the worker, and explore both supervised and self-supervised approaches. In the supervised setting, we prove a characterization: monitoring is possible with vanishing error and query rates exactly when the class of possible monitor functions has finite Littlestone dimension. This connects worker monitoring with an established literature on adversarial online learning. For self-supervision, we propose a co-training procedure based on test-time distillation: the monit...

AuthorsJoseph H. Rudoler, Kevin Tan, Benedict Tessler et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published28 September 2026
Last updated at source28 September 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/fcbdd69b-5237-420a-82bf-500b8014be7d" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.