Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

CrisisFake: Benchmark Validity of AI-Generated Text Detection for Disaster Social Sensing

Disaster social sensing converts public social-media posts into evidence for situational awareness and humanitarian response, but plausible LLM-generated posts can contaminate this information stream and distort assessments of needs, damage, and resource priorities. This study empirically investigates whether text-based detectors can distinguish human-authored from LLM-generated disaster posts and what textual cues underlie their judgments. We construct CrisisFake, a Qwen2.5-7B-based dataset of 12,000 texts organized into 3,000 matched semantic units from nine disasters. Each unit contains an original human post, a minimally LLM-proofread human post, a fact-preserving LLM-generated post p...

AuthorsXiaoshan Zhou, Zaifu Zhan
Primary categorycs.CL
Published21 September 2026
Last updated at source7 October 2026
cs.CLcs.CY
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f4f55bc0-1f7a-4390-a583-9812edfada5b" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.