Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Evaluating the Effects of Prompt Perturbation on Bias and Hallucination in Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in various natural language processing tasks, leading to their widespread deployment as intelligent assistants in decision-making contexts. However, the increasing complexity of these models raises concerns about their reliability, particularly regarding bias and hallucination. In this work, we evaluate the robustness of LLMs to perturbed variations of the original inquiry in decision-making tasks. We show that contrary to previous studies, perturbations can mitigate bias and hallucination in some LLMs over other models. It's found that Claude 3 is more effective for the tasks represented in most datasets, whereas models like...

AuthorsMamehgol Yousefi, Ahmad Shahi, Mos Sharifi et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published18 September 2026
Last updated at source18 September 2026
cs.CLcs.AIcs.HC
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/83c23480-8c84-4716-9408-1d6f55bf1a2d" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.