Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Failure-Transparent Agents: Benchmarking Post-Failure Reporting in Tool-Using Language Models

Tool-using agents can fail twice: a required tool can fail, and the agent can then report success without the evidence needed to justify it. Existing benchmarks often entangle this reporting failure with tool selection, recovery, and environment dynamics. We introduce Failure-Transparent Agents (FTA), a controlled benchmark that fixes the failed observation and required evidence state before generation, making post-failure claims directly auditable. FTA contains 100 tasks with deterministic failure traces spanning five failure families, a neutral control, and four user-pressure conditions, and evaluates unsupported claims alongside useful recovery. Across six models, three response polici...

AuthorsJunru Zhu, Shiming Xie, Aime Lu Fan Chen et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published28 September 2026
Last updated at source28 September 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ec5b71d8-0caf-4301-a3cb-9ddae8e083b2" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.