Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

What Makes World Action Models Generalize? An Empirical Study of Test-Time Future Modeling

World action models (WAMs) predict the future alongside actions during training. Due to the heavy computation cost of video denoising, whether the future must still be generated during inference is disputed: Explicit WAMs denoise it into clean frames along with every action chunk, whereas Latent WAMs discard it entirely for acceleration. We find that latent WAMs, despite matching explicit ones on in-distribution tasks, fail to retain the generalization benefits that originally motivated WAMs. To demonstrate this, we evaluate generalization along three axes: environmental perturbation, data efficiency, and task generalization. Controlled comparisons with a matched backbone, training data, ...

AuthorsRenping Zhou, Zanlin Ni, Zihao Fan et al.
Primary categorycs.CV
Published28 September 2026
Last updated at source29 September 2026
cs.CVcs.RO
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/bd62951b-4bef-432d-83c4-8afa400d74f5" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.