Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

RAGWarrant: Evidence-Preserving Governance for RAG Policy Promotion Under Quality, Cost, Latency, and Risk Constraints

Retrieval-augmented generation systems are extensively instrumented with metrics, benchmarks, traces, and automated judges, but these tools do not decide whether a proposed policy change is safe to release. We present RAGWarrant, an open-source promotion-control framework that treats deployment as a constrained evidence decision rather than a leaderboard choice. RAGWarrant normalizes evaluator outputs and operational telemetry, applies predeclared quality and hard-risk gates, assigns evidence-class claim ceilings, preserves negative outcomes, and emits auditable PROMOTE, BLOCK, REJECT, or INCONCLUSIVE decisions. We evaluate the framework across T2-RAGBench, MultiHop-RAG, CRAG, HotpotQA, s...

AuthorsRichard Krueger, Lucas Krause, Zach Pocquette
Primary categorycs.AI
Published28 September 2026
Last updated at source28 September 2026
cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f510612c-0bca-4b9a-8029-30d67a8a7887" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.