Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Counterexamples to Local Reconstruction Gain as a Proxy for Final Fidelity in Residual Completion

Residual completion augments query-aware sparse attention by estimating the contribution of tokens omitted from the exact sparse computation. We ask whether improving a layer's attention-output reconstruction on the same incoming Q/K/V and selected support necessarily improves the fidelity of the final model output. We study training-free RESA and learned Top-K+$φ$ with frozen backbone language models. A prespecified single-layer screen yields two Qwen3-0.6B/Multi-LexSum interventions for which direct-runtime measurements show positive prespecified request-aggregate local reconstruction gain but worse final KL fidelity than the corresponding all-abstain Exact Top-K baseline on both discov...

AuthorsYasuto Hoshi, Daisuke Miyashita, Jun Deguchi
Primary categorycs.LG
Published28 September 2026
Last updated at source28 September 2026
cs.LGcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f8481db1-fb8b-4be4-89f9-ef058e753ad3" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.