Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Quizzing the Translation: A Prover-Grounded Evaluation Metric for NL$\rightarrow$FOL

A standard pipeline for symbolic reasoning over natural-language problems translates them into first-order logic and invokes a theorem prover. The translation step is the bottleneck: swap "every" for "some" and every inference that follows is corrupted. Yet today's metrics often score more broken translations higher than less broken ones, because BLEU, BERTScore, and Smatch++ reward surface overlap that the worst errors happen to preserve. We introduce SIV, which derives two kinds of probes from the target formula and uses a theorem prover to verify the candidate translation against each. Positive probes are statements the candidate must entail, which detect translations that drop content...

AuthorsPu Suo, Ali Emami
Primary categorycs.CL
Published27 September 2026
Last updated at source27 September 2026
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LO
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/7fee0cf6-bd98-404a-bea4-dfd55738745a" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.