Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Diagnosing Sampled LLM Reasoning in Formal Geometry: Coverage, Realization, and Validity Evidence

Repeated sampling can reveal a correct numerical answer without yielding either a reliable system output or a supported derivation. We present Coverage, Realization, and Validity Evidence (CRV), an evaluation protocol for sampled large language model (LLM) reasoning over formal geometry states. Coverage is answer availability, realization is readout accuracy on the frozen candidate pool, and validity evidence is a label-blinded critic judgment of derivational support rather than a proof certificate. CRV freezes each candidate pool before comparing readouts and analyzes covered failures by correct-answer multiplicity and within-problem discrimination. On HardShift441, a 441-problem set for...

AuthorsXiao Yue, Guangzhi Qu
Primary categorycs.AI
Published26 September 2026
Last updated at source26 September 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b2b7672f-6a23-49ea-99f0-69a599743b3d" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.