Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Multimodal LLMs Outperform Pathology Foundation Models in Cross-Domain Histological Similarity

State-of-the-art pathology foundation models, trained on millions of histology tiles, can fail to preserve tissue similarity when comparisons cross slide or institution boundaries. We show that general-purpose multimodal LLMs, without being trained as pathology foundation models, consistently outperform these specialized models in cross-domain histological similarity judgments. Using a relative similarity framework that we release as the MOSAIC (Model Similarity Assessment across Institutions and Cohorts) benchmark, we evaluate 17 models across 6 datasets and find that pathology encoders often rank same-institution, different-disease tiles as more similar than same-disease, different-inst...

AuthorsYishu Zhang, Yun Li, Daiwei Zhang
Primary categorycs.CV
Published26 September 2026
Last updated at source29 September 2026
cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/83dedef0-3f80-4556-81f9-2c55dcd6a4a7" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.