Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Are Vision-Language-Action Models Robust to One-Step Observation Perturbations?

Understanding the safety risks of vision-language-action (VLA) models is essential for their deployment in the physical world. Existing safety research has mainly considered persistent perturbations that are applied continuously to observations throughout an episode. However, momentary observation corruption, in which observations are severely perturbed only briefly within an episode, remains an underexplored safety threat. To address this gap, this work investigates robustness to one-step perturbations applied at a single time step per episode. Our experiments reveal that these perturbations substantially degrade VLA performance and that their impact depends on the action chunk execution...

AuthorsShojiro Yamabe, Jun Sakuma
Primary categorycs.AI
Published26 September 2026
Last updated at source26 September 2026
cs.AIcs.LGcs.RO
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/cfa249f4-1363-40c8-b04c-6c0aeb909075" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.