Recipe-Matching, Not Equivalence
MathNet-Retrieve asks a retriever to find, for a math problem, a document stating the same problem. An LLM under one fixed prompt writes each gold document and its near-miss distractors; LLM judges filter them. We call this procedure the "recipe", training on pairs built the same way "recipe-matching", and ask how much score it buys beyond the ability the benchmark claims to test. Two models from one base, matched in rows and settings, differ only in the training file: pairs written under the benchmark's published prompt by another vendor's LLM and judge, or computer-algebra-verified pairs with no LLM anywhere. The first leads by 45 R@1 points on the easy tier. By a non-LLM paraphrase con...
| Authors | Ali Habibullah, Mohammad Alshiekh, Yazan Alshoibi et al. |
|---|---|
| Primary category | cs.IR |
| Published | 25 September 2026 |
| Last updated at source | 25 September 2026 |
Popularity, last 5 days
0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.
Connected in the knowledge graph
- KAUSTAcademy/RecipeMatching_eval-artifactsDataset · cited by
Models and datasets referencing this paper
Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 21 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.