Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Towards Understanding LLM-Based Log Anomaly Detection: An Empirical Study of Performance, Efficiency, and Robustness

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated promising performance in log anomaly detection, yet how their adaptation strategies, architectures, and deployment configurations affect detection effectiveness remains insufficiently understood. To investigate these factors, we conduct a systematic empirical analysis across three public log datasets, examining different adaptation strategies, model architectures, parameter scales, and quantization settings. Our results reveal substantial performance differences across adaptation strategies, while model scaling yields varying detection gains across datasets. We further observe that models with comparable detection accuracy can exhibit markedl...

AuthorsBin Li, Dongdong Wang, Siyang Lu
Primary categorycs.LG
Published25 September 2026
Last updated at source25 September 2026
cs.LGcs.CR
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/faf3764e-390a-4c3b-b23f-2e9d9aaeeae1" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.