Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

GHOST-Q: Towards Studying Grounding Hallucinations Overlooked Under Same-score TradeOffs in Quantized VLMS

Post-training quantization of vision--language models (VLMs) is typically assessed through aggregate task accuracy and memory savings, but preserving a headline score does not guarantee preservation of visual grounding behavior. We present GHOST-Q, a cross-precision controlled evaluation of three 8B VLM families under FP16, INT8, and NF4 across utility and hallucination-sensitive benchmarks. Rather than comparing only aggregate accuracy, we pair FP16 and quantized predictions item by-item to quantify how compression redistributes grounding successes and failures. Five of six quantized variants preserve MMStar accuracy within $\pm2$ percentage points, yet 10 of 36 paired effects remain sig...

AuthorsSaim Rehman, Muhammad Shafique
Primary categorycs.CV
Published24 September 2026
Last updated at source24 September 2026
cs.CVcs.AIcs.LGcs.MM
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/cbf653fb-3d78-4936-adc9-c0960905f335" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.